Solution · Consolidations

Collapse the stack.
Keep the coverage.

Four monitoring tools you contracted. Four more you didn’t know you had. Before anything is sunset, Panaptico verifies the surviving tool covers the full expected population — real denominators, not vendor claims — keeps both sides observed through the switchover, and gates retirement on verified absence: nothing still depends on what you turn off.

Consolidation Verification· OBSERV-CONSOL-0007 · Day 18 of 120
4 + 4 shadow → 1

Observed · 4 sanctioned

  • Splunk

    Splunk

    $3.20M/yr

    Logs · SIEM-adjacent search

  • New Relic

    New Relic

    $680K/yr

    APM · browser · mobile

  • Dynatrace

    Dynatrace

    $1.10M/yr

    Infra · full-stack APM

  • AppDynamics

    AppDynamics

    $940K/yr

    Business APM · transaction analytics

+ 4 shadow · $587K/yr

Surfaced as findings, with evidence — none in the declared inventory.

Datadog

Surviving tool

Datadog

Capabilities covered
8 of 8
Coverage
98.1%
Evidence freshness
≤ 5m
Unknown
35 services

Spend reclaimed

$3.41M/yr

$6.51M retiring · $3.10M consolidated · gated on verified absence

The gap

Coverage gaps don’t announce themselves.

01

Vendor claims are not denominators

The surviving tool ‘supports logs’ the way every tool supports everything. Verification asks a harder question: does it cover all 1,847 services you expect — and which ones, exactly, sit in the gap?

02

The switchover is where silence wins

Mid-switchover, the old tool is half off and the new one is half on. A service that stopped reporting looks exactly like a service that’s fine. Panaptico keeps both sides observed and reports the silence as Unknown — never as a pass.

03

Retirement is a claim until absence is verified

Cut the contract and an integration keeps calling the dead tool. Nothing is sunset until Panaptico verifies absence: no workload, integration, or team still depends on what you’re about to turn off.

Shadow discovery

The tools you didn’t know you bought.

Panaptico compares the inventory you declared against what is actually observed across the estate. Every overlapping or unsanctioned tool surfaces as a finding — with evidence, an owner, and the scope it touches.

Findings

4

Owners attributed

4 / 4

Shadow spend

$587K/yr

  • 3× Grafana Cloud tenants

    Platform, Data, Mobile eng

    $180K

    No SSO · personal billing · orphaned dashboards

  • 2× New Relic accounts (out-of-contract)

    Acquired team · legacy project

    $240K

    Auto-renewed · outside master agreement

  • Honeycomb POC in production

    Checkout service

    $95K

    POC · no SSO · two engineers with keys

  • Datadog trial, never terminated

    SRE sandbox

    $72K

    Trial became monthly · no owner on record

Coverage matrix

Coverage, verified per capability, per tool.

Every capability is evaluated against its expected population in every tool — covered, gap, or Unknown. Denominators come from observed state, not vendor claims, and a capability that can’t be observed is never assumed covered.

Capability
Splunk
New Relic
Dynatrace
AppDynamics
  • Logs
    ?
  • APM · distributed tracing
  • Infrastructure monitoring
    ?
  • RUM · real-user monitoring
  • Synthetic monitoring
    ?
  • Dashboards
  • Alerting / monitors
    ?
  • Business transaction analytics
Covered · verified against the expected populationUnknown · unobserved, never assumed coveredGap · not covered

Switchover verification

Both sides stay observed until the new side is verified.

While workloads move, the retiring tool and the surviving tool are verified side by side — expected population, evaluated coverage, evidence freshness. Gaps surface the moment they open, and nothing is assumed moved.

From

Splunk

To

Datadog Logs

Logs

both sides observed · ingest parity verified daily · evidence ≤ 5m old

42 TB/day

From

New RelicDynatraceAppDynamics

To

Datadog APM

APM · tracing

1,812 verified reporting on the new side · 35 Unknown — never assumed moved

1,847 services

From

Dynatrace

To

Datadog Infra

Infrastructure

3,081 at target · 19 off target · old side stays observed until absence is verified

3,100 hosts

From

New RelicDynatrace

To

Datadog RUM

RUM

38 verified emitting sessions · 3 Unknown — no traffic observed yet

41 apps

From

Dynatrace

To

Datadog Synthetics

Synthetic

both sides evaluated green for 14 days before the old checks retire

317 checks

From

SplunkNew RelicDynatraceAppDynamics

To

Datadog Dashboards

Dashboards

268 verified in use · 454 with no views observed in 90d — retirement candidates

722 dashboards

From

SplunkNew RelicDynatraceAppDynamics

To

Datadog Monitors

Alerts / monitors

612 verified equivalent on the surviving side · 471 redundant · 20 Unknown

1,103 monitors

From

AppDynamics

To

Datadog APM + custom metrics

Business txn analytics

1,320 verified covered · 80 gap — surfaced as findings before sunset

1,400 txns

Verified retirement

Retirement is gated on verified absence.

Retiring

$6.51M / yr

  • Splunk

    $3.20M

  • New Relic

    $680K

  • Dynatrace

    $1.10M

  • AppDynamics

    $940K

  • Shadow tools (4 findings)

    $587K

Surviving tool

$3.10M

Datadog · coverage verified across 8 of 8 capabilities

Spend reclaimed / yr

$3.41M

52% reduction · reclaimed as each retirement is verified

Verified absent

2 of 4 tools

Open dependencies

3 · blocking sunset

Four tools, one platform.
Coverage kept. Spend reclaimed.

Panaptico surfaces the shadow tools, verifies the surviving tool against real denominators, keeps both sides observed through the switchover, and gates every retirement on verified absence. The spend comes back — with evidence behind it.

← Migrations·Related: Adoption tracking